#  Insight from Mohd Daud Mat Din, Senior Fellow, Bait Al Amanah, Malaysia. Edward S. Mason Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School 

 





April 09, 2026

 

 

- [ Blog ](/news-categories/blog)
 
 

 

 ![Photo of Mohd Daud Mat Din](/sites/g/files/omnuum8096/files/2026-04/IMG_Small_Mohd%20Daud%20Mat%20Din.jpg)

 

**Practitioner Insight: Mohd Daud Mat Din,** Senior Fellow, Bait Al Amanah, Malaysia.   
Edward S. Mason Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School  
*(\*These are his personal views and not representative of the ministries he has worked with.)*

**Q: What is your current role and title?**  
I’m currently a Senior Fellow at Bait Al Amanah (House of Trust). Before this, I worked as a Parliament and Strategic Affairs Officer to the Minister of Defense, and earlier as a Parliament Officer to the Minister of Higher Education. Most of my work sits at the intersection of policy and practice. It’s really about taking analysis and making sure it leads to something useful, accurate and implementable.

**Q: In your opinion, what are one or two key elements of strong policy writing?**  
For me, policy writing is really about thinking clearly. If your thinking is clear, your writing usually follows. If it’s not, no amount of editing and facts or info will fix it. The first thing is to be very clear about the issue. What exactly are we trying to solve or address and why does it matter? Then you have to make things easy for the reader. Most of the time, you’re writing for someone who doesn’t have much time and yet they are the decision maker. They just want to understand the options, the trade-offs, and what you’re recommending. And it has to be factually accurate and align with the position they are taking. Not just what works in theory, but what can actually work in the system you’re in. If someone has to reread your memo just to understand your point, that’s already a problem.

**Q: What advice would you give to new policy writers?**  
A lot of people jump straight into the writing. It’s crucial to spend more time getting your thinking right first. You need to be clear about who you’re writing for. Writing for a minister is very different from writing for an academic audience. Another thing is, don’t try too hard to sound impressive. In policy work, being clear is much more important than sounding clever. It also helps to understand how things actually get done. Many good ideas don’t go anywhere because they don’t take implementation seriously. And finally, be comfortable with rewriting. Most good policy documents go through several rounds before they’re ready.

**Q: What is one common mistake you see among junior analysts?**  
They tend to overcomplicate things. Some tend to overcrowd the draft with jargon! There’s too much background, too many words, and not enough clarity on the main point. In reality, decision-makers are usually looking for direction. What’s the issue, and what should we do about it? If you can’t explain your idea simply, it’s often a sign that the thinking isn’t fully there yet.

**Q: How do you ensure that new policies do not contradict existing ones?**  
You have to take the time to understand what’s already in place. That means not just reading the policy documents but also understanding how they’re being implemented in practice. Sometimes on paper everything looks aligned, but on the ground, there are overlaps or even contradictions. It helps to speak to the agencies involved. They usually have a much clearer sense of what is actually happening. In many cases, you realize the issue isn’t the lack of a new policy. It’s that existing policies need better alignment or adjustment.

**Q: How has working closely with ministers shaped how you approach policy writing?**  
It makes you more aware of how limited their time is. You might spend days working on something, but they may only have a few minutes to go through it. So you learn to be more direct and to get to the point quickly. You also see that decisions are not made based only on what looks best on paper. Timing matters, feasibility matters, and whether it fits with other priorities. More importantly, political correctness must also be considered. So, your role is not just to analyze, but to present something that can realistically move forward.



 

 

 



 

 See also:- [ Practitioner Insight ](/category/practitioner-insight)
 
 

 Share on:- [     Facebook ](#)
- [     Twitter ](#)
- [     Linkedin ](#)